|
Canada-0-Stables selskapets Kataloger
|
Firma Nyheter:
- No. 24-952 In the Supreme Court of the United States
The Arizona Supreme Court’s Express Preemption Hold-ing Demands Review The Decision Below Creates an Intolerable Split The outcome of this case would have been different in federal court 1 The Ninth Circuit has held that § 5108 “preempts state and local taxes on permanent improvements built
- Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court of the United States JASON SMITH, Petitioner, v STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Arizona Court of Appeals BRIEF IN OPPOSITION KRISTIN K MAYES Attorney General of Arizona DANIEL C BARR Chief Deputy Attorney General JOSHUA D BENDOR Solicitor General
- ARIZONA SUPREME COURT
On remand, the Arizona Supreme Court held that the failure of a jury to find the aggravating factors rendering Sansing eligible for a death sentence was harmless error
- In the Supreme Court of the United States
In the Supreme Court of the United States _____ No 24-952 S OUTH POINT ENERGY CENTER, LLC, PETITIONER, v ARIZONA D counsel for petitioner South Point Energy Center, LLC and a member of the Bar of this Court, certify that, on June 10, 2025, the Reply Brief was sent, by third-party commercial carrier for delivery overnight and via
- Supreme Court of the United States
panel opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, reproduced at App 103–51, is available at 23 F 4th 1173 (9th Cir 2022) The order of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona granting Petitioners’ motion for summary
- In the Supreme Court of the United States
An abuse of discretion occurs when “the reasons given by the court for its action are clearly untenable, legally incorrect, or amount to a denial of justice ”
- Supreme Court of the United States
The Martin court did say that local governments can still enforce anti-camping ordinances It said that “[e]ven where shelter is unavailable, an ordinance pro-hibiting sitting, lying, or sleeping outside at particular times or in particular locations might well be constitu-tionally permissible ” 920 F 3d at 617 n 8 Yet in prac-
- Supreme Court of the United States
But the Arizona Supreme Court has let this violation slide, concluding that law enforcement would have inevitably discovered Ian’s DNA profile because he was convicted of two felony offenses—more than four years after the illegal search
- Supreme Court of the United States
Arizona Supreme Court Case No CV 24-0017, 1 30 2024 Arizona Supreme Court Case No CV 24-0032, 5 14 2024 3 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Phoenix District Office 3500 North Central Avenue, Suite 690 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Web site: www eeoc gov DETERMINATION AND NOTICE OF RIGHTS
- I Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court of the United States ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE ARIZONA SUPREME COURT A (800) 274-3321 • (800) 359-6859 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION 131189 SOUTH POINT ENERGY CENTER, LLC, Petitioner, v ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; MOHAVE COUNTY, Respondents KIMBERLY JOAN CYGAN Assistant Attorney General Counsel of Record OFFICE OF
|
|