|
- logic - What is the difference between Fact and Truth? - Philosophy . . .
Truth is what the singer gives to the listener when she’s brave enough to open up and sing from her heart But still curious about the difference between both of them In our daily life, in general conversation, we generally use these both terms interchangeably Then what is the difference? Are they synonym or have specific difference?
- How Exactly Do You Define Truth? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
In summary truth emerges only after more thorough philosophy is gained, from East to West everyone has their own intuitive idiosyncratic notion of truth, thus its nature is highly dependent on ones' entire metaphysical or epistemic system
- What is the philosophical difference between Reality and Truth?
Truth is a property of propositions, mostly propositions claiming facts Hence truth lives in a completely different domain "It rains today" is a proposition which claims a fact The proposition can be true or false On the other hand, facts are not true or false Instead, they are or they are not See also What is the difference between Fact
- truth - How does Logic define true and false? - Philosophy Stack . . .
Exsistence is axiomatic and just exsists Truth is not a strong word and can be manipulated with (post hoc - add hoc) alernatives How dose logic define true and false from mazy of out-of-context-facts?
- logic - The absolute truth paradox - Philosophy Stack Exchange
"There is no absolute truth because we as humans are restrained from ever knowing it" is fallacious, what humans can know imposes no restriction on what is And "this" will only be a way out of the paradox after it specifies which axioms of classical logic are supposed to be dropped, and shows that what is left is enough and otherwise reasonable There are several options described in standard
- truth - What is opinion? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
It is commonly agreed that there is a clear distinction between fact and opinion Physical facts can be verified Opinion varies and may be based on faith But what about opinions which, over time,
- truth - Is to be able to describe something to be able to judge that it . . .
A sentence is truth apt if there is some context in which it could be uttered (with its present meaning) and express a true or false proposition Thus, to argue anymore over whether the sentence is true is merely resolved by accepting that it is true within a domain of discourse, that is, the sentence is truth-apt
- Is there such a thing as completely objective truth?
Your "complete objective truth" spec sounds like Kant's Thing-in-itself, and by Kant's Critique, our minds may attempt to correlate in useful ways, perhaps even closely accurate ways, with the structure and order of the various aspects of the universe, but cannot know these "things-in-themselves" (noumena) directly As a concession if you'd like to formulate your desired truth in such
|
|
|