- differences - When to use cannot versus cant? - English Language . . .
When is it best to write "can't" versus writing "cannot"? Are they interchangeable in every situation?
- What is the difference between can not, cannot, and cant?
The phrase "can not" may mean "cannot" or "can't," but it also may mean "able not to," which is much different than "not able to" as it conveys the ability to not do something rather than the inability to do it
- Cannot vs. Can Not - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
So, "cannot" means something (denoted S) is impossible, while "can not" means the inverse of that something (denoted !S) is possible These two statements do not imply each other Of course, the second statement could be rendered much more clearly as "The variable can be not initialized," by moving the "not" next to the word being negated
- Can not vs. cannot - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
8 Both are acceptable, but cannot is now more common OED has this much to say about cannot: (ˈkænət) the ordinary modern way of writing can not: see CAN v Notwithstanding, in some situations ambiguity may arise if you write can not, and the difference might not be a minor one Compare: I cannot make love to you
- Why is “cannot” spelled as one word? - English Language Usage . . .
Why is “cannot” spelled as one word whereas other similar constructions such as “do not,” “will not,” “shall not,” “may not” and “must not” are spelled as two words (unless they are contracted as “
- The usage of can not vs. cannot in mathematics
So here it’s about minimizing ambiguity: can not permits two interpretations, while cannot permits only one Such care is critical in the language of mathematics As another example, West would tell you that in mathematical discourse, both “x is a minimum” and “x is a minimal” are valid utterances, but they mean different things
- What’s the difference between cannot and can’t? [duplicate]
Can anyone explain the difference between cannot and can’t is? Is the only difference that cannot is more formal than can’t is?
- You cannot eat your cake and have it or have your cake and eat it?
The irony of the idiom is that one would expect to be able to eat the cake that he or she owned In that case, possession of the cake would logically come before usage of the cake: You cannot have your cake and eat it, too Some other interesting observations: Paul Brians, Professor of English at Washington State University, points out that perhaps a more logical or easier to understand
|